This topic contains 13 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by 20 hours, 33 minutes ago.
October 22, 2013 at 6:02 am #7350
GOP lawmakers grill EPA on water reg ‘power grab’
Calling the plan a “massive power grab,” Republican lawmakers are asking the Environmental Protection Agency to explain why it’s in such a rush to implement a federal regulation which they argue could have a major impact on private property rights.October 22, 2013 at 3:30 pm #7404
There is even more on this than what I read here .They want to do with water they did with CO 2 and claim it is a pollutant.It has to do with runoff causes pollution.
Well here I am .October 22, 2013 at 4:57 pm #7416
Not entirely holly, as ya know, for many years, folks would gather the rain, run off from their roof gutters, into rain barrels, tanks or cisterns, to use for house hold water. Actually, there are areas, were this is the only way you can get good clean water. We use to trap rain run off, into ponds or large cistrens, to use for irrigation.
However, now it has ben determined that the rain does not belong to us, the people. It belongs to the state or federal governments. In order for you to use THIER rain water, you must first jump thru a bunch of hoops, kiss many hinneys, and then pay a exorbant fee, in hopes that they will then give you permission to use THIER rain! It has to do with one thing only–Control of the sheeple!October 22, 2013 at 6:17 pm #7422
So true… I know a couple of towns in MA where it is illegal to have rain barrels.. Go Figure!
The EPA and the government just want CONTROL.. Even if there is no real science or reasoning/logic behind their mandates… Like the new Ethanol Content requirement in gas.
EPA admits new coal regulations won’t reduce global warmingOctober 22, 2013 at 6:20 pm #7423
Timber industry suffers as loggers blame federal regs for lost jobs
In the last two decades, more than 200 sawmills have closed in the Pacific Northwest due to federal regulations, directly killing 40,000 good-paying jobs.January 19, 2014 at 11:34 am #11894
GOP lawmakers accuse EPA of muzzling scientists on climate regulationsFebruary 11, 2014 at 11:50 am #12616
GOP bill would force EPA to reveal science behind regulationsFebruary 23, 2014 at 8:14 am #12887
High court climate case looks at EPA’s powerFebruary 24, 2014 at 7:21 pm #12929
<h1>EPA trying to get around Congress?</h1>February 25, 2014 at 7:02 pm #12956
Did EPA overstep in tackling global warming? Supreme Court sharply splitFebruary 28, 2014 at 6:10 am #13005
Here they go again….
States fear ‘power grab’ by EPA in Chesapeake Bay cleanup effortMarch 3, 2014 at 11:26 am #13108
The EPA admitted themselves that these new regs would not impact global warming.. So… Why then… To destroy whatever energy independence the US has.. To make it so costly that they get the unproven “clean energy” agenda pushed?
EPA reportedly will announce new sulfur emissions ruleMarch 15, 2014 at 8:30 am #13441
Wyoming welder faces $75,000 a day in EPA fines for building pond on his property
March 15, 2014 at 8:31 am #13443
- This reply was modified 20 hours, 33 minutes ago by SGingras.
Report criticizes EPA for raid on Alaska miners, but says agency did not break law
- This reply was modified 20 hours, 32 minutes ago by SGingras.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.